| Weighed silver in an ancient account system |
High; metal valued by weight |
Not a claim; metal itself is payment |
Depends on polity and obligation |
Merchants, temples, palaces, households |
Commodity money / accounting system; not fiat |
Unit of account and payment medium may differ, but metallic value materially anchors settlement. |
| Lydian electrum coin, c. 575 BCE |
High precious-metal content |
Not ordinarily a redeemable claim |
State acceptance likely important; exact rules vary |
Lydian or regional authority |
Commodity money with institutional premium |
Mint mark and standard reduce verification cost; value still substantially metallic. |
| Early Roman silver denarius |
High silver content |
Coin is the commodity object |
Legal monetary status under Roman authority |
Roman state/mints |
Commodity-hybrid; not fiat |
Face, tax, and state authority add value, but silver content remains material. |
| Heavily debased late Roman coin |
Reduced precious metal; token element grows |
Usually not a fixed redemption claim |
State-denominated money |
Roman state/mints |
Fiduciary/token coin; disputed fiat-like status |
Debasement separates denomination from metal but does not automatically create a nonconvertible modern fiat unit. |
| Private Sichuan jiaozi, c. 1010 |
Paper has negligible material value |
Yes, into iron coin |
Not initially sovereign legal tender |
Merchant houses |
Private credit/representative; not fiat |
Value rests on issuer solvency and coin redemption. |
| Song government jiaozi, early controlled issues |
Paper |
Formally exchangeable with reserve and replacement rules |
Government-issued; legal status varied by region/issue |
Song government |
Representative/hybrid |
Public monopoly and tax use matter, but meaningful redemption prevents a simple fiat label. |
| Later Southern Song huizi |
Paper |
In principle; increasingly weak in practice |
Public currency |
Southern Song government |
Probable fiat-like/hybrid |
De jure features and de facto inability to redeem diverged as issue expanded. |
| Yuan Zhongtong notes, 1260–1275 |
Paper |
Meaningful silver-related convertibility |
Sole legal tender from 1271 |
Yuan government |
Representative public money |
Government monopoly does not make a convertible note fiat. |
| Yuan paper, 1276–1309 |
Paper |
Nominal or restricted, often unavailable |
Sole legal tender |
Yuan government |
Fiat-like hybrid |
Practical nonconvertibility grows while formal relationships persist. |
| Yuan paper, 1310–1368 |
Paper |
No ordinary commodity redemption |
Sole legal tender; used in taxes and payments |
Yuan government |
Clear early fiat |
Legally nonconvertible public paper intended as principal money. |
| Ming Da Ming Baochao, from 1375 |
Paper |
No ordinary reverse conversion into metal |
Compulsory/public standard, though enforcement and practice weakened |
Ming government |
Clear or probable fiat |
National nonconvertible issue; depreciation reflects weak retirement, tax demand, and supply discipline. |
| Bank of Amsterdam ledger money, early phase |
Book entry linked to deposited coin |
Withdrawal under bank rules |
Required/privileged for specified large settlements |
Municipal public bank |
Deposit/representative bank money |
Ledger form is not fiat by itself. |
| Bank of Amsterdam ledger money, later phase |
Book entry |
Redemption practices altered |
Public settlement money |
Municipal public bank |
Disputed fiat or fiat-like ledger money |
Scholarship differs over when the liability ceased behaving as redeemable deposit money. |
| Stockholms Banco credit note, 1661 |
Paper |
Promised coin on demand |
Widely accepted, not sovereign fiat by origin |
Private chartered bank |
Fiduciary/representative; not fiat at issue |
Bank failed when it could not honor redemption. |
| Bank of England convertible note, eighteenth century |
Paper |
Yes, in specie under normal rules |
Legal status strengthened over time |
Chartered Bank of England |
Representative banknote |
Public-finance connection and fractional reserves do not erase the coin promise. |
| Bank of England note during Restriction, 1797–1821 |
Paper |
No current gold payment |
Legal and public acceptance strengthened |
Bank of England under parliamentary restriction |
Temporary fiat or fiat-like hybrid |
Operationally nonconvertible, but resumption remained an explicit policy objective. |
| Massachusetts bill of credit, 1690 |
Paper |
Retired or received through future taxes rather than fixed metal redemption |
Colonial public-payment status |
Colonial government |
Tax-backed public credit / hybrid |
Fiscal redemption differs from commodity convertibility; credibility depends on future levies. |
| Continental dollar, 1775–1780s |
Paper |
No reliable current metal redemption; future fiscal redemption contemplated |
Legal-tender treatment varied by state and time |
Continental Congress |
Fiat-like revolutionary public credit |
Weak federal tax authority, war, counterfeiting, and political uncertainty undermined value. |
| Assignat, 1789 initial form |
Paper |
Linked to purchase of national lands; interest-bearing |
Became legal tender later |
Revolutionary French state |
Asset-linked public debt; not pure fiat initially |
Land association was not a simple fixed cash redemption but was economically meaningful. |
| Assignat after October 1790 |
Paper |
No ordinary fixed commodity redemption |
Yes |
Revolutionary French state |
Fiat money with an asset narrative |
Circulating legal-tender paper expanded beyond credible land retirement and fiscal capacity. |
| U.S. greenback, 1862–1878 |
Paper |
Not currently redeemable in coin |
Yes, with statutory exceptions |
U.S. Treasury/Congress |
Clear nineteenth-century fiat |
Nonconvertible legal-tender United States Notes circulated during specie suspension. |
| U.S. greenback after 1 January 1879 |
Paper |
Redeemable in coin |
Yes |
U.S. Treasury |
Representative/fiduciary within specie regime |
Same named note changes classification when convertibility resumes. |
| Classical gold-standard banknote |
Paper |
Yes, at fixed gold parity under national rules |
Usually, subject to law |
Central or authorized note-issuing bank |
Representative money; not fiat |
Fractional reserve does not negate a legally enforceable conversion promise. |
| Sterling during World War I suspension |
Paper/deposits |
Gold conversion suspended or constrained |
Yes |
Bank of England and banking system |
Temporary fiat-like hybrid |
Current operation is nonconvertible, but authorities intend restoration. |
| Bretton Woods U.S. dollar, 1958–1971 |
Paper/reserve balances |
Not for ordinary citizens; officially convertible for eligible foreign authorities at $35/oz |
Yes domestically |
Federal Reserve/Treasury system |
Domestic fiat, international representative hybrid |
Classification differs by holder and level of the monetary system. |
| Post-1973 U.S. dollar |
Paper and electronic central-bank liabilities |
No commodity conversion |
Yes |
Federal Reserve/Treasury under U.S. law |
Clear modern fiat |
Floating exchange rate and no gold redemption; supported by fiscal, legal, settlement, and market institutions. |
| Euro |
Paper and electronic central-bank liabilities |
No commodity conversion |
Yes within euro-area law |
Eurosystem |
Clear multinational fiat |
One central bank system serves multiple sovereign fiscal authorities. |
| Commercial-bank deposit |
Electronic ledger claim |
Convertible at par into cash/central-bank money, not commodity |
Usually not “legal tender” itself |
Commercial bank |
Credit money denominated in a fiat unit |
Private bank liability; monetary because of par convertibility, settlement, regulation, and network use. |
| Retail CBDC |
Digital central-bank liability |
Convertible at par into other forms of central-bank money; no commodity claim |
Depends on legislation |
Central bank |
Digital fiat base money |
Technology changes access and form, not the nonconvertible monetary standard. |
| Fiat-backed stablecoin |
Digital token/private claim |
Promised fiat redemption, subject to issuer terms |
Usually not legal tender |
Private issuer |
Representative or credit-like token, not sovereign fiat |
Stability derives from fiat assets and redemption; reserve and insolvency law determine claim quality. |